Create Flashcards. This will result in a serious problem in the future as the growing boys are looking for wives. Therefore, there is no justification to kill them. There is no easy line where the fetus is said to be a person, because from the time it comes into being it is alive and growing. At this age the baby feels pain, can be taught things, and also has dream why is abortion wrong essay on the brain waves.
Recent Posts
Forget the all-nighters and find some writing inspiration with our free essay samples on any topic. It's time for you to nail your grades! The debate over the right to abort a fetus has been ranging in the United States and around the world for decades. Also, abortion can be problematic, even for those who support it. Women who have undergone an abortion often suffer from serious psychological trauma post-abortion, grieving for their unborn babies. On a societal level, why is abortion wrong essay, abortion is problematic because it opens the door to moral acceptance of sex-selective abortions, which is already causing problems in many regions. The primary issue debated by those involved in the abortion argument today is the point at which an embryo becomes a human being.
If a person assumes that an embryo is not a person until it is born, or until it can survive out of the womb, abortion is morally acceptable. This is because, before this point, the fetus is not a person, but merely a collection of cells, with no more rights than a guppy Caczor 1. Given this fact, the killing of such a collection of cells is not problematic. However, those who oppose abortion note how early life begins. Within weeks a heart is beating, and long before a fetus is viable outside of the womb it has many human characteristics. There is no easy line where the fetus is said to be a person, because from the time it comes into being it is alive and growing.
For this reason, those who oppose abortion believe that life begins when a woman becomes pregnant. Therefore, aborting a fetus is killing a human child. This is not morally acceptable. Need A Unique Essay on "Why Abortion is Wrong"? Once a person has accepted that it is morally impermissible to abort a fetus because that fetus is a living human child, it becomes clear that the unborn child has rights. If a fetus is not a living child, as those who oppose abortion accept, then it makes sense to argue that a woman has the right to rid herself of the fetus. If she does not want to remain pregnant, she should have the right to why is abortion wrong essay herself of the fetus.
However, those who oppose abortion argue that a mother would never consider conveniently killing a six-year-old when the child becomes a nuisance, that that would never accept this as morally all right. The same considerations should be given, then to mothers who are pregnant. There is no difference between the unborn child and the six-year-old. However, As Caczor writes, those who are helping to find solutions for families with six-year-old children who are faced with less than ideal circumstances will do their upmost to see that the six-year-old has the best chances at an improved quality of life. They do not kill the child to remove him why is abortion wrong essay her from these circumstances. The same should apply to unborn babies, since they have the same moral status why is abortion wrong essay the six-year-old children, why is abortion wrong essay.
There are difficult cases which blur the lines of course, but these cases are rare and should not dictate moral obligation for the vast majority of cases where there are acceptable options other than abortion. Another way of seeing the problems related to the practice of abortion is to examine what happens with abortion is legal and seen as morally acceptable. Some of these problems are related to the psychological health of mothers who have undergone an abortion. As found by Curley and Johnson, mothers who have had an abortion open themselves to serious psychological consequences. They were suffering from PTSD related to the abortion, depression, anxiety and perinatal grief Though they made the decision to have the procedure, the abortion itself caused them stress and anxiety, and they grieved for the children they no longer why is abortion wrong essay. Their psychological trauma was moderate to severe, and it lasted for years in many cases.
The moral impermissiveness of abortion is shown by the negative feelings so many women experience after aborting their babies. Another way in which the moral wrongness of abortion is shown is the fact that in many regions of the world, it is now seen as acceptable to have an abortion if the unborn baby is of the wrong sex. As noted by Kanowsky, many regions such as West Asia are experiencing uneven gender growth because of the acceptability of killing unborn girls. Though statistics on how wide-spread this practice is, Kanowsky notes that in China the ratio of boys to girls being born is something like Kanowsky This means that for every boys born there are only girls.
This will result in a serious problem in the future as the growing boys are why is abortion wrong essay for wives. It also results, Kanowsky writes, in a hidden form of gendercide, why is abortion wrong essay. For those regions on earth where women are less valued than men and seen as dispensable, abortions can be used to see that they are never born. If abortions become morally acceptable, this kind of discrimination may be a logical, why is abortion wrong essay, if unfortunate, next step. This may cause serious sociological problems in the future. Those who support abortions feel that there is some kind of magical line between the fetus as a collection of cells and the fetus as living human being. Some say this is at birth, and some say this is before birth, once the fetus can survive outside of the womb.
However, for opponents of abortion, the fetus is a living child as soon as it is formed. This makes abortion wrong because it is the killing of a child, just as the killing of a six-year-old is a child. Seeing a fetus in this way makes it clear that a woman should not be able to abort a child simply because it is inconvenient, or because it will impact her lifestyle. Furthermore, when abortion is an acceptable alternative, why is abortion wrong essay, it causes problems of its own. For example, it causes psychological trauma and grief in the women who have aborted babies, why is abortion wrong essay, and it makes increases the likelihood of killing babies who are unwanted simply because they are of a given sex.
The practice of abortion is wrong not only for unborn babies, but for society as a whole. Having a child especially having a child is less-than-ideal circumstances, is difficult. But there are many alternatives for women to explore that do not involve the killing of an innocent, unborn baby. Why not get a unique paper done for you? Use code: CUSTOM Skip to content Forget the all-nighters and find some writing inspiration with our free essay samples on any topic. Search for:. Order Now. Do My Essay Use code: CUSTOM20 Code copied! Use it at checkout.
writing essays services
There is no difference between the unborn child and the six-year-old. However, As Caczor writes, those who are helping to find solutions for families with six-year-old children who are faced with less than ideal circumstances will do their upmost to see that the six-year-old has the best chances at an improved quality of life. They do not kill the child to remove him or her from these circumstances. The same should apply to unborn babies, since they have the same moral status as the six-year-old children. There are difficult cases which blur the lines of course, but these cases are rare and should not dictate moral obligation for the vast majority of cases where there are acceptable options other than abortion. Another way of seeing the problems related to the practice of abortion is to examine what happens with abortion is legal and seen as morally acceptable.
Some of these problems are related to the psychological health of mothers who have undergone an abortion. As found by Curley and Johnson, mothers who have had an abortion open themselves to serious psychological consequences. They were suffering from PTSD related to the abortion, depression, anxiety and perinatal grief Though they made the decision to have the procedure, the abortion itself caused them stress and anxiety, and they grieved for the children they no longer had. Their psychological trauma was moderate to severe, and it lasted for years in many cases.
The moral impermissiveness of abortion is shown by the negative feelings so many women experience after aborting their babies. Another way in which the moral wrongness of abortion is shown is the fact that in many regions of the world, it is now seen as acceptable to have an abortion if the unborn baby is of the wrong sex. As noted by Kanowsky, many regions such as West Asia are experiencing uneven gender growth because of the acceptability of killing unborn girls. Though statistics on how wide-spread this practice is, Kanowsky notes that in China the ratio of boys to girls being born is something like Kanowsky This means that for every boys born there are only girls. This will result in a serious problem in the future as the growing boys are looking for wives. It also results, Kanowsky writes, in a hidden form of gendercide.
For those regions on earth where women are less valued than men and seen as dispensable, abortions can be used to see that they are never born. If abortions become morally acceptable, this kind of discrimination may be a logical, if unfortunate, next step. Therefore, on the topic of abortions, I am pro-life. Pro-life advocates contend there is no morally significant difference between the embryo you once were and the adult you are today that would justify killing you at that earlier stage of development. Differences of size, level of development, environment and degree of dependency are not good reasons for saying you had no right to life then but you do now.
As I would see it, when a lady engages in sexual relations, she is taking a risk. She does this of her own through and through freedom, and is responsible for what she is doing. On the off chance that a man chooses to engage in sexual relations, regardless of whether it is finished with security or not, the outcome is her duty and she should will manage the results. One such outcome is getting pregnant. At the point when a lady gets pregnant, it is generally her very own aftereffect decisions, regardless of whether the pregnancy is undesirable or spontaneous.
How it works. The most evident motivation behind why I feel that premature birth is corrupt is on the grounds that it is the deliberate slaughtering of an individual. Life starts right now of origination. On the off chance that it is murder to slaughter a person in any phase of life, at that point premature birth, the homicide of the baby, is clearly wrong, since homicide is one of the moral absolutes. When we play out a premature birth, we end the life of a honest kid. Marquis argues that killing infants and young children denies them the privilege of enjoying the value of their future. A fetus is a human being that is in the early stages of development. Therefore, its future is laden with experiences, projects, and activities that are characteristic of the lives of adult human beings.
According to Marquis, fetuses, infants, and young children, as well as adult human beings, have a right to enjoy their future. For that reason, any factor that renders the killing of adult human beings immoral also renders the killing of fetuses and infants morally wrong. Marquis argues that abortion is rendered immoral not by the fact that fetuses are persons but because they have a future similar to that of human beings. Killing affects the victim by denying the opportunity to experience the goodness and value of their future. If someone claimed that this theory validates the killing of children in the third world or war-torn countries, Marquis would give a counterargument based on the immoral aspect of various factors that deprive children of their future.
It can be deduced from his argument that any action that deprives an individual of a valuable future is morally wrong. He would argue that poverty, war, and diseases are morally wrong states that should not be used as reasons to kill children. Marquis would compare the killing of children to the killing of a person living with AIDS. In the article, he argues that the worst that can happen to an AIDS patient is sudden death. Children living in war-torn and third world countries are not destined for a dreadful future. It is impossible to determine whether the future of these children will be miserable. Therefore, there is no justification to kill them. The present does not define the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment